Bridging Mythology and Science: Lessons from a Mental Mapping Workshop on the Perception of Environmental Health Crises

Abstract

This article presents a report on a mental mapping workshop conducted in Estonia within the framework of the CHRYSES project, examining the methodological, ethical and analytical insights gained at the workshop and situating them within a broader theoretical context. Drawing on both the structure and outcomes of the workshop and making comparisons with other topical case studies, the article demonstrates how mental mapping can serve as an effective tool for uncovering differences and gaps between
scientific and grassroots (for example mythological-folkloric) approaches to environmental health crises (EHC). These variations – manifested in spatial priorities, narrative emphases, and related risk assessments – offer critical lessons for improving public communication and engagement in the face of future EHC scenarios. By highlighting best practice considerations, this study contributes to advancing participatory methods that bridge knowledge systems and enhance resilience in environmental health governance.